Proving Reflexivity: Is X×Y A Reflexive Space?

by Luna Greco 47 views

Hey everyone! Today, we're diving deep into the fascinating world of functional analysis, specifically exploring the concept of reflexive Banach spaces. Our main goal? To prove that the space Z=X×YZ = X × Y is reflexive, given that XX and YY are themselves reflexive Banach spaces. This is a crucial concept in understanding the structure and properties of these spaces, so let's break it down step by step.

Understanding Reflexive Banach Spaces

Before we jump into the proof, let's quickly recap what it means for a Banach space to be reflexive. Guys, this is super important! A Banach space is essentially a complete normed vector space – think of it as a vector space where we can measure distances and where sequences that "should" converge actually do converge. Reflexivity takes this a step further.

A Banach space XX is reflexive if the canonical embedding J:XXJ: X \rightarrow X^{**} is surjective. Okay, that's a mouthful! Let's unpack it. XX^{**} represents the double dual space of XX. The dual space, XX^*, consists of all bounded linear functionals on XX (linear transformations that map XX to the scalar field, usually real or complex numbers, and are "well-behaved" in terms of boundedness). The double dual, XX^{**}, is then the dual of the dual space, meaning it's the space of bounded linear functionals on XX^*.

Now, the canonical embedding JJ is a natural map that takes an element xx from XX and maps it to a functional in XX^{**}. This functional, denoted as J(x)J(x), acts on elements ff in XX^* by simply evaluating ff at xx, i.e., J(x)(f)=f(x)J(x)(f) = f(x). Reflexivity demands that this map JJ is not just injective (one-to-one) but also surjective (onto). Surjectivity means that every functional in XX^{**} can be obtained as the image of some element in XX under the map JJ. In simpler terms, a reflexive space is "big enough" to capture all the functionals on its dual space. So, to prove that ZZ is reflexive, we'll need to show that this canonical embedding is surjective for ZZ.

Defining the Space Z = X × Y

Alright, let's define our space ZZ more precisely. We're given that Z=X×YZ = X × Y, which is the Cartesian product of the Banach spaces XX and YY. This means that elements in ZZ are ordered pairs of the form z=(x,y)z = (x, y), where xx belongs to XX and yy belongs to YY. But how do we make this into a Banach space itself? We need a norm!

The problem states that the norm on ZZ is defined as: $|z| = (|x|^p + |y|p){\frac{1}{p}}, \forall z = (x, y) \in X × Y$ here, 1p1 \leq p \leq \infty. This is a generalization of the usual Euclidean norm. When p=2p = 2, it's exactly the Euclidean norm, but we can consider other values of pp as well. The case when p=p = \infty is interpreted as z=maxx,y\|z\| = max{\|x\|, \|y\|}. Guys, remember that a norm needs to satisfy certain properties: it should be non-negative, it should be zero only for the zero vector, it should scale correctly with scalar multiplication, and it should satisfy the triangle inequality. It can be proven that this definition indeed gives a valid norm on ZZ.

Since XX and YY are Banach spaces, and we've equipped ZZ with a valid norm, we can also show that ZZ is a Banach space. This is because completeness (the property that Cauchy sequences converge) is preserved under this construction. So, ZZ is a Banach space, and now we're ready to tackle the main question: is it reflexive?

The Proof: Z = X × Y is Reflexive

Here's the heart of the matter! We want to prove that ZZ is reflexive, given that XX and YY are reflexive Banach spaces. Our strategy is to show that the canonical embedding JZ:ZZJ_Z: Z \rightarrow Z^{**} is surjective. To do this, we'll leverage the reflexivity of XX and YY and construct a suitable preimage in ZZ for any functional in ZZ^{**}.

Let FZF \in Z^{**} be an arbitrary element in the double dual of ZZ. This means FF is a bounded linear functional on ZZ^*. We need to find a z=(x,y)Zz = (x, y) \in Z such that JZ(z)=FJ_Z(z) = F. In other words, we need to find xXx \in X and yYy \in Y such that F(ϕ)=ϕ(z)=ϕ(x,y)F(\phi) = \phi(z) = \phi(x, y) for all ϕZ\phi \in Z^*.

The key here is to understand the structure of the dual space ZZ^*. It can be proven that ZZ^* is isometrically isomorphic to X×YX^* × Y^*. This means there's a norm-preserving linear bijection between ZZ^* and X×YX^* × Y^*. Intuitively, this means that any bounded linear functional on ZZ can be represented as a combination of bounded linear functionals on XX and YY. More precisely, for every ϕZ\phi \in Z^*, there exist unique fXf \in X^* and gYg \in Y^* such that ϕ(x,y)=f(x)+g(y)\phi(x, y) = f(x) + g(y) for all (x,y)Z(x, y) \in Z.

Now, let's use this representation to define functionals F1F_1 on XX^* and F2F_2 on YY^*. For any fXf \in X^*, define F1(f)=F(ϕ)F_1(f) = F(\phi), where ϕZ\phi \in Z^* is given by ϕ(x,y)=f(x)\phi(x, y) = f(x). Similarly, for any gYg \in Y^*, define F2(g)=F(ϕ)F_2(g) = F(\phi), where ϕZ\phi \in Z^* is given by ϕ(x,y)=g(y)\phi(x, y) = g(y). It can be proven that F1F_1 and F2F_2 are bounded linear functionals, so F1XF_1 \in X^{**} and F2YF_2 \in Y^{**}.

This is where the reflexivity of XX and YY comes into play! Since XX is reflexive, the canonical embedding JX:XXJ_X: X \rightarrow X^{**} is surjective. This means there exists an xXx \in X such that JX(x)=F1J_X(x) = F_1. Similarly, since YY is reflexive, there exists a yYy \in Y such that JY(y)=F2J_Y(y) = F_2. In other words, we have: $F_1(f) = J_X(x)(f) = f(x), \forall f \in X^$ $F_2(g) = J_Y(y)(g) = g(y), \forall g \in Y^$

Now, let's consider the element z=(x,y)Zz = (x, y) \in Z. We claim that JZ(z)=FJ_Z(z) = F. To prove this, we need to show that JZ(z)(ϕ)=F(ϕ)J_Z(z)(\phi) = F(\phi) for all ϕZ\phi \in Z^*. Let ϕZ\phi \in Z^* be arbitrary. As we discussed earlier, there exist unique fXf \in X^* and gYg \in Y^* such that ϕ(x,y)=f(x)+g(y)\phi(x, y) = f(x) + g(y). Then:

JZ(z)(ϕ)=ϕ(z)=ϕ(x,y)=f(x)+g(y)J_Z(z)(\phi) = \phi(z) = \phi(x, y) = f(x) + g(y)

On the other hand:

F(ϕ)=F(ϕ)F(\phi) = F(\phi), where ϕ(x,y)=f(x)+g(y)\phi(x, y) = f(x) + g(y).

Recall how we defined F1F_1 and F2F_2: F1(f)=F(ϕ)F_1(f) = F(\phi) where ϕ(x,y)=f(x)\phi(x, y) = f(x), and F2(g)=F(ϕ)F_2(g) = F(\phi) where ϕ(x,y)=g(y)\phi(x, y) = g(y). Therefore:

F(ϕ)=F1(f)+F2(g)F(\phi) = F_1(f) + F_2(g)

Now, using the reflexivity of XX and YY:

F1(f)+F2(g)=JX(x)(f)+JY(y)(g)=f(x)+g(y)F_1(f) + F_2(g) = J_X(x)(f) + J_Y(y)(g) = f(x) + g(y)

Combining these results, we have:

JZ(z)(ϕ)=f(x)+g(y)=F(ϕ)J_Z(z)(\phi) = f(x) + g(y) = F(\phi)

This holds for all ϕZ\phi \in Z^*, so we've proven that JZ(z)=FJ_Z(z) = F. Since FZF \in Z^{**} was arbitrary, this shows that the canonical embedding JZJ_Z is surjective. Therefore, Z=X×YZ = X × Y is reflexive.

Conclusion

So, there you have it, guys! We've successfully proven that if XX and YY are reflexive Banach spaces, then their product space Z=X×YZ = X × Y, equipped with the norm z=(xp+yp)1p\|z\| = (\|x\|^p + \|y\|^p)^{\frac{1}{p}}, is also a reflexive Banach space. This is a powerful result that highlights how reflexivity is preserved under certain operations. Understanding reflexivity is crucial for many advanced topics in functional analysis, so hopefully this detailed explanation has been helpful!

This proof relies heavily on the properties of reflexive spaces and the structure of dual spaces. We used the fact that ZZ^* is isomorphic to X×YX^* × Y^* and leveraged the surjectivity of the canonical embeddings for XX and YY. Remember, the key idea is to find a pre-image in ZZ for any functional in ZZ^{**}, and we accomplished this by carefully constructing the elements xx and yy using the reflexivity of XX and YY. Keep practicing these concepts, and you'll become a functional analysis pro in no time!