The Biggest Oscars Snubs Ever: A Look Back At The Academy's Biggest Mistakes

Luna Greco

6 min read

Post on May 08, 2025

4.7

Share

The Case of Citizen Kane (1941): A Technical Masterpiece Overlooked?

Citizen Kane, Orson Welles's groundbreaking 1941 masterpiece, remains a cinematic landmark, influencing generations of filmmakers. Its innovative techniques, including deep focus cinematography and non-linear storytelling, were revolutionary for their time. Yet, despite its critical acclaim and lasting impact, Citizen Kane only won a single Oscar: Best Original Screenplay. This is frequently cited as one of the biggest Academy Award snubs in history.

• Groundbreaking cinematography: The film's innovative use of deep focus, low-angle shots, and chiaroscuro lighting created a visually stunning and emotionally resonant experience.
• Innovative narrative structure: The non-linear storytelling, told through flashbacks and multiple perspectives, was unprecedented and remains influential today.
• Powerful performance by Orson Welles: Welles's performance as Charles Foster Kane is iconic, showcasing his immense range and captivating screen presence.
• Lost to How Green Was My Valley: The Best Picture win for How Green Was My Valley over Citizen Kane continues to spark heated discussions, questioning the Academy's judgment and highlighting a potential bias towards more traditional filmmaking styles.

The ongoing debate about Citizen Kane's deserved win underscores its enduring legacy. Despite the snub, it remains a cornerstone of film history, a testament to its artistic merit and innovative approach to filmmaking. Its absence from the Best Picture category remains one of the most debated Oscars snubs.

The Best Picture Snub of The Shawshank Redemption (1994): A Critical Darling Denied

The Shawshank Redemption, released in 1994, is a prime example of a film that achieved immense critical acclaim and cultural impact but failed to secure a Best Picture win. Its powerful storytelling, stellar performances, and enduring popularity made its loss to Forrest Gump a significant Oscars snub.

• Powerful storytelling: The film's compelling narrative of hope and perseverance resonated deeply with audiences and critics alike.
• Stellar performances from Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman: The performances by Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman remain iconic, showcasing their incredible talent and onscreen chemistry.
• Enduring popularity and cultural relevance: The Shawshank Redemption continues to be celebrated as a cinematic masterpiece, maintaining its popularity and cultural relevance decades after its release.
• Lost to Forrest Gump: The Academy's preference for Forrest Gump over The Shawshank Redemption is often cited as a puzzling decision, sparking ongoing debates about the Academy's decision-making process.

The snub only heightened the film's status as a beloved classic. Its enduring popularity and critical reassessment solidified its place in cinematic history, highlighting that Academy Award wins don't always reflect a film's true merit. It remains a prominent example in conversations about Oscars snubs.

Raging Bull (1980): Scorsese's Masterpiece and the Best Actor Snub for De Niro

Martin Scorsese's Raging Bull (1980) is another example of a critically acclaimed film marked by a significant Oscars snub. Robert De Niro's transformative performance as Jake LaMotta is widely considered one of the greatest acting achievements in cinematic history, yet he lost the Best Actor award to Robert Duvall for Kramer vs. Kramer.

• De Niro's transformative performance: De Niro’s physical and emotional transformation for the role was remarkable, showcasing his dedication and unparalleled skill.
• Scorsese's innovative directing style: Scorsese's innovative use of slow motion, black and white cinematography, and jarring editing perfectly complemented De Niro's performance.
• Lost to Robert Duvall for Kramer vs. Kramer: This snub remains controversial, with many arguing that De Niro's performance was far superior and more deserving of the award.

This snub remains a point of contention among film critics and enthusiasts. The fact that such a powerful and transformative performance was overlooked continues to fuel conversations around subjective judging and the inherent imperfections of award ceremonies. It’s a constant reminder of potential Oscars snubs in the acting category.

Snubs Beyond Best Picture and Acting: Supporting Roles and Technical Awards

The discussion of Oscars snubs often focuses on Best Picture and Best Actor/Actress, but significant injustices also occur in supporting categories and technical awards. These often-overlooked snubs are equally impactful, diminishing the recognition of talented individuals and crucial creative contributions.

• Example: Supporting Actor/Actress snub: Many brilliant supporting performances have been overlooked, resulting in frustrating snubs for actors who delivered memorable performances. For example, [insert a specific example of a supporting actor/actress snub and explain why it's noteworthy].
• Example: Significant technical achievement snub: Technical achievements like cinematography, editing, and sound design are often crucial to a film’s success. Snubs in these categories diminish the contributions of skilled professionals. [insert a specific example of a technical achievement snub and explain why it's noteworthy].

These smaller category snubs highlight a broader issue: the potential for systemic biases within the Academy. They contribute to a larger conversation about the inclusivity and fairness of the award process. These oversights are critical when discussing past Oscars snubs.

Analyzing the Academy's Choices: Trends and Explanations

The recurring pattern of Oscars snubs raises questions about the Academy's decision-making process. Several factors likely contribute to these controversial choices:

• The role of Academy voters and their preferences: The Academy's membership demographics and personal preferences inevitably influence voting patterns, potentially leading to biases.
• The influence of studio campaigns and marketing: Studio campaigns play a significant role in promoting films and shaping perceptions among Academy voters. Strategic marketing efforts can influence outcomes.
• The impact of historical context and cultural shifts: Societal values and cinematic trends also impact the Academy's choices, leading to shifts in what types of films and performances are favored over time.

Over time, the Academy has attempted to address these issues, striving for greater inclusivity and transparency. Understanding these factors provides crucial context for interpreting past Oscars snubs.

Conclusion:

The history of the Oscars is punctuated by memorable moments, but also by controversial omissions. The Oscars snubs discussed here – from iconic films like Citizen Kane to powerhouse performances like De Niro's in Raging Bull – serve as reminders of the subjective nature of artistic judgment and the inherent complexities of award ceremonies. While these snubs may spark debate, they also highlight the enduring power of cinema and the continued relevance of these films, even without the coveted golden statue. By understanding these past Oscars snubs, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the rich history of filmmaking and the ongoing conversation surrounding cinematic excellence. So, dive deeper and explore your own opinions on these and other significant Oscars snubs – what do you think are the biggest Academy Awards mistakes ever?